dMSA Account Creation by an Unusual User
Detects creation of a delegated Managed Service Account by an unusual subject account. Attackers can abuse weak child-object or msDS-DelegatedManagedServiceAccount rights during account migration to elevate privileges.
Rule type: new_terms
Rule indices:
- winlogbeat-*
- logs-system.security*
- logs-windows.forwarded*
Rule Severity: high
Risk Score: 73
Runs every:
Searches indices from: now-9m
Maximum alerts per execution: 100
References:
Tags:
- Domain: Endpoint
- OS: Windows
- Use Case: Threat Detection
- Tactic: Privilege Escalation
- Use Case: Active Directory Monitoring
- Data Source: Active Directory
- Data Source: Windows Security Event Logs
- Resources: Investigation Guide
Version: 5
Rule authors:
- Elastic
Rule license: Elastic License v2
Audit Directory Service Changes must be enabled to generate the events used by this rule. Setup instructions: https://ela.st/audit-directory-service-changes
- What dMSA object did the alert show, and where was it created?
- Focus: use
winlog.event_data.ObjectClass,winlog.event_data.ObjectDN,winlog.event_data.ObjectGUID,winlog.event_data.SubjectUserName, andwinlog.computer_nameto identify the new msDS-DelegatedManagedServiceAccount, new-to-this-rule writer, and controller. - Implication: escalate when the object is in a privileged service, sync, backup, DC, or identity-infrastructure path, or when name or writer lacks a narrow service-account purpose; lower only when DN, writer, and controller match one exact planned dMSA rollout or lab path.
- Focus: use
- Did the same dMSA receive migration or privilege-enabling attributes?
- Why: BadSuccessor-style abuse elevates creation with
5136changes such as msDS-ManagedAccountPrecededByLink, msDS-DelegatedMSAState, SPNs, delegation attributes, or gMSA membership. - Focus: review same-object
5136and5137records on this controller withwinlog.event_data.ObjectGUID, comparingwinlog.event_data.AttributeLDAPDisplayName,winlog.event_data.AttributeValue, andwinlog.event_data.ObjectDN. $investigate_0 - Hint: if same-controller results have gaps, repeat the
winlog.event_data.ObjectGUIDsearch across DC Windows Security logs before treating missing follow-on changes as lower risk. - Implication: escalate when values link the dMSA to a privileged predecessor, advance migration state, or add SPN/delegation material; lower suspicion only when attributes form one bounded migration to the intended legacy service account.
- Why: BadSuccessor-style abuse elevates creation with
- Who created the dMSA, and what session reached the domain controller?
- Focus: identify writer and session with
winlog.event_data.SubjectUserSidandwinlog.event_data.SubjectLogonId, then recoversource.ip,winlog.logon.type, andwinlog.event_data.AuthenticationPackageName. $investigate_1 - Hint: this pivot uses
winlog.event_data.TargetLogonIdfor4624or4634; search4648separately withwinlog.event_data.SubjectLogonIdwhen explicit-credential use matters. Missing authentication telemetry is unresolved, not benign. - Implication: escalate for an unexpected human, helpdesk account, low-privilege service identity, unusual source, interactive/RDP session, or explicit-credential path; lower suspicion only when actor and source match the narrow identity-management path for this object.
- Focus: identify writer and session with
- Did the same session touch other directory objects?
- Focus: compare surrounding
5137and5136records on the samehost.idforwinlog.event_data.SubjectLogonId, readingwinlog.event_data.ObjectDN,winlog.event_data.ObjectClass, andwinlog.event_data.AttributeLDAPDisplayName. - Implication: escalate when the session creates multiple dMSAs, edits ACLs, changes delegation, or touches unrelated privileged users, computers, groups, or service accounts; lower when every change stays tied to one bounded dMSA rollout.
- Focus: compare surrounding
- Did the new dMSA get used from systems that should not touch it?
- Focus: derive the dMSA from the CN in
winlog.event_data.ObjectDN, confirm it inwinlog.event_data.TargetUserName, then review4624records forsource.ip,winlog.logon.type, andwinlog.event_data.AuthenticationPackageName; search4648separately for explicit credential use. - Hint: absent dMSA authentication is a timing or visibility gap, not proof creation is harmless.
- Implication: escalate when the dMSA authenticates from unexpected servers, workstations, jump hosts, or non-service logon types; lower suspicion only when use stays inside the exact service host set for the confirmed rollout.
- Focus: derive the dMSA from the CN in
- If local evidence is suspicious or incomplete, do related Windows Security events show broader AD abuse?
- Focus: review events for writer
user.id, then compare records referencing the newwinlog.event_data.ObjectGUID. $investigate_2 - Hint: use the object-event view for shadow credentials, delegation abuse, unusual service changes, or other AD tampering tied to the same dMSA. $investigate_3
- Implication: escalate and expand scope when either entity is tied to privilege abuse, directory tampering, or suspicious authentication; keep scope to this object when related events are quiet, but do not close solely because no other event exists.
- Focus: review events for writer
- Escalate for sensitive placement, privileged migration links, unexpected writer/session context, broader directory edits, unexpected dMSA authentication, or related AD-abuse events; close only when telemetry and outside confirmation prove one exact planned migration or lab activity; if mixed or incomplete, preserve directory-change and session evidence and escalate.
- Planned dMSA rollout or service-account migration can legitimately create msDS-DelegatedManagedServiceAccount objects. Confirm expected
winlog.event_data.ObjectDN, same-object5136attributes limited to the intended legacy service account, andwinlog.event_data.SubjectUserSid, recoveredsource.ip, andwinlog.logon.typematching the narrow migration account and host path. If change records, migration tickets, or owner confirmation are unavailable, leave unresolved unless telemetry proves the exact authorized workflow. - Lab validation or staged service-account modernization can also trigger this rule. Confirm
winlog.event_data.ObjectDNstays in the test/staging OU, the samewinlog.event_data.SubjectLogonIdavoids unrelated privileged objects, and anywinlog.event_data.TargetUserName,source.ip, orwinlog.logon.typeactivity stays limited to designated test systems. If test scope lacks outside confirmation, treat the alert as unresolved. - Before creating an exception, validate exact writer
winlog.event_data.SubjectUserSid, dMSA path pattern, bounded same-object5136attributes, controller path, and recovered source. Use a temporary or tightly scoped exception for one-time migrations, and avoid exceptions on event5137, all msDS-DelegatedManagedServiceAccount objects, or all dMSA creation activity.
- If confirmed benign, reverse any temporary containment and document the evidence that proved the authorized workflow:
winlog.event_data.SubjectUserSid,winlog.event_data.ObjectDN, same-object5136sequence, recoveredsource.ip,winlog.logon.type, and exact rollout or lab scope. - If suspicious but unconfirmed, preserve a case export with the triggering
5137, related same-object5136records, recovered4624or4648records, and key object/session identifiers before containment. Apply reversible containment first, such as temporary DC access restrictions for the recovered source or heightened monitoring on the writer and dMSA. Disable the writer or isolate the source host only if privileged follow-on changes, unexpected authentication, or related events appear. - If confirmed malicious, preserve the same directory-change and session evidence first, then remove the unauthorized dMSA and roll back related msDS-ManagedAccountPrecededByLink, msDS-DelegatedMSAState, SPN, delegation, or membership changes found in the same-object sequence. Isolate the recovered source host when endpoint response is available and host criticality permits, then disable or reset the compromised writer and any linked service accounts.
- Before deleting objects or closing the case, review hosts and services that used the new dMSA, verify rollback replication across domain controllers, then rotate affected secrets or restore service bindings.
- Post-incident hardening: restrict who can create dMSAs or start service-account migration, review CreateChild and delegated managed service account rights on service-account OUs, retain
5136,5137,4624, and4648coverage on domain controllers, and record the confirmed workflow or BadSuccessor evidence pattern for future triage.
event.code:5137 and host.os.type:"windows" and winlog.event_data.ObjectClass:"msDS-DelegatedManagedServiceAccount"
Framework: MITRE ATT&CK
Tactic:
- Name: Privilege Escalation
- Id: TA0004
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0004/
Technique:
- Name: Valid Accounts
- Id: T1078
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078/
Sub Technique:
- Name: Domain Accounts
- Id: T1078.002
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1078/002/
Technique:
- Name: Account Manipulation
- Id: T1098
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/
Framework: MITRE ATT&CK
Tactic:
- Name: Persistence
- Id: TA0003
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003/
Technique:
- Name: Create Account
- Id: T1136
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1136/
Sub Technique:
- Name: Domain Account
- Id: T1136.002
- Reference URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1136/002/