﻿---
title: Best practices for Scout UI tests
description: Best practices specific to Scout UI tests. Default to parallel UI suites when possible. Parallel workers share the same Kibana/ES deployment, but run...
url: https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/ui-best-practices
products:
  - Kibana
---

# Best practices for Scout UI tests
Best practices specific to Scout **UI tests**.
<tip>
  For guidance that applies to both UI and API tests, see the [general Scout best practices](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/best-practices). Scout is built on Playwright, so the official [Playwright Best Practices](https://playwright.dev/docs/best-practices) also apply.
</tip>


## Prefer parallel runs

Default to [parallel UI suites](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/parallelism) when possible. Parallel workers share the same Kibana/ES deployment, but run in isolated Spaces.

| Mode           | When to use                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Parallel**   | UI tests (most suites), suites that share pre-ingested data (often using the [global setup hook](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/global-setup-hook)) |
| **Sequential** | API tests, suites that require a “clean” Elasticsearch state                                                                                                                                   |


## Test behavior, not data correctness

UI tests should answer “does this feature work for the user?” Verify that components render, respond to interaction, and navigate correctly. Leave exact data validation (computed values, aggregation results, edge cases) to API or unit tests, which are faster and less brittle.

| What you’re testing                                                         | Recommended layer  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| User flows, navigation, rendering                                           | Scout UI test      |
| Data correctness, API contracts, edge cases                                 | Scout API test     |
| Isolated component logic (loading/error states, tooltips, field validation) | RTL/Jest unit test |

<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don’t:** verify computed values that belong in an API test:
  ```ts
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('row-0-col-count')).toHaveText('1,024');
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('row-0-col-avg')).toHaveText('42.7');
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** verify that the UI renders and responds to interaction:
  ```ts
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('datasetQualityTable-loaded')).toBeVisible();
  await page.testSubj.click('tableSortByLastActivity');
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('row-0-col-dataset')).not.toHaveText('');
  ```
</dropdown>


## Prefer realistic in-app navigation for user flows

When a test asserts **user flow** (not just “land on a page”), prefer navigation the way a user would: follow links and buttons, and use browser history (`page.goBack()`) instead of direct URL jumps where it matters for the scenario. Reserve `page.goto` / deep links for cheap setup when the test is not about navigation.

## Prefer APIs for setup and teardown

Setup/teardown using UI is slow and brittle. Prefer Kibana APIs and fixtures.
<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don’t:** create test data through the UI:
  ```ts
  test.beforeEach(async ({ page, browserAuth }) => {
    await browserAuth.loginAsAdmin();
    await page.testSubj.click('createDataViewButton');
    await page.testSubj.fill('indexPatternInput', 'logs-*');
    await page.testSubj.click('saveDataViewButton');
  });
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** use API fixtures:
  ```ts
  test.beforeEach(async ({ uiSettings, kbnClient }) => {
    await uiSettings.setDefaultTime({ from: startTime, to: endTime });
    await kbnClient.importExport.load(DATA_VIEW_ARCHIVE_PATH);
  });
  ```
</dropdown>


## Use Playwright auto-waiting

Playwright actions and [web-first assertions](https://playwright.dev/docs/best-practices#use-web-first-assertions) already wait/retry. Don’t add redundant waits, and never use `page.waitForTimeout()` as it’s a hard sleep with no readiness signal and a common source of flakiness.
<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don’t:** add unnecessary waits before actions or assertions:
  ```ts
  await page.testSubj.waitForSelector('myButton', { state: 'visible' });
  await page.testSubj.click('myButton');
  await page.testSubj.locator('successToast').waitFor();
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('successToast')).toBeVisible();
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** let Playwright handle waiting automatically:
  ```ts
  await page.testSubj.click('myButton');
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('successToast')).toBeVisible();
  ```
</dropdown>


## Wait for UI updates after actions

When an action triggers async UI work (navigation, saving, loading data), wait for the resulting state before your next step. This ensures the UI is ready and prevents flaky interactions with elements that haven’t rendered yet.
<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  await page.gotoApp('sample/page/here');
  await page.testSubj.waitForSelector('mainContent', { state: 'visible' });
  ```
</dropdown>


## Don't use manual retry loops

If an action fails, don't wrap it in a retry loop. Playwright already waits for actionability; repeated failures usually point to an app issue (unstable DOM, non-unique selectors, re-render bugs). Fix the component or make your waiting/locators explicit and stable.
<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don't:** retry actions in a loop:
  ```ts
  for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
    try {
      await page.testSubj.click('submitButton');
      break;
    } catch {
      await page.waitForTimeout(1000);
    }
  }
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** fix the root cause (for example, wait for a readiness signal):
  ```ts
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('formReady')).toBeVisible();
  await page.testSubj.click('submitButton');
  ```
</dropdown>


## Locate UI elements reliably

Prefer stable `data-test-subj` attributes accessed using `page.testSubj`. If `data-test-subj` is missing, prefer adding one to source code. If that’s not possible, use `getByRole` **inside a scoped container**.
<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don’t:** use raw CSS selectors or unscoped text matchers (searching the entire page for text is unreliable when duplicates exist):
  ```ts
  await page.click('[data-test-subj="myButton"]');
  await page.getByText('Delete').click();
  ```
  ❌ **Don’t:** select elements by index ([flagged by Playwright’s recommended ESLint rules](https://playwright.dev/docs/best-practices)), as they break on non-clean environments where tests run without server restart and extra data may exist:
  ```ts
  await page.testSubj.locator('tableRow').nth(0).click();
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** use `page.testSubj` or scoped `getByRole`:
  ```ts
  await page.testSubj.click('myButton');
  await page.testSubj.locator('confirmDeleteModal').getByRole('button', { name: 'Delete' }).click();
  ```
</dropdown>


## Avoid unnecessary timeout overrides

Scout configures Playwright timeouts ([source](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/platform/packages/shared/kbn-scout/src/playwright/config/create_config.ts)). Prefer defaults.
- Don’t override suite-level timeouts/retries with `test.describe.configure()` unless you have a strong reason.
- If you increase a timeout for one operation, keep it well below the test timeout and **add a short code comment** explaining why (slow first load, CI variance, known heavy view, etc.).
- After raising timeouts for flakiness, **re-run the flaky test runner** (or many local repeats) to confirm the new value is necessary.
- Keep in mind that an assertion timeout that exceeds the test timeout is ignored.
- Time spent in hooks (`beforeEach`, `afterEach`) counts toward the test timeout. If setup is slow, the test itself may time out even though its assertions are fast.

<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  await expect(editor).toBeVisible();

  // justified: report generation can be slow
  await expect(downloadBtn).toBeEnabled({ timeout: 30_000 });
  ```
</dropdown>


## Wait for complex UI to finish rendering

Tables/maps/visualizations can appear before data is rendered. Prefer waiting on a component-specific **“loaded” signal** rather than global indicators like the Kibana chrome spinner (our data shows they are unreliable for confirming that a particular component has finished rendering).
**Do not rely on helpers that only wait for a global “loading” indicator to disappear.** Each view should have an explicit readiness wait (or removal of such helpers in favor of those waits).
<dropdown title="Example">
  In source code, use a dynamic `data-test-subj`:
  ```tsx
  <EuiBasicTable
    data-test-subj={`myTable-${isLoading ? 'loading' : 'loaded'}`}
    loading={isLoading}
    items={items}
    columns={columns}
  />
  ```
  In tests, wait for the loaded state:
  ```ts
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('myTable-loaded')).toBeVisible();
  ```
  For Kibana Maps, `data-render-complete="true"` is often the right “ready” signal.
</dropdown>


## Use existing page objects to interact with the Kibana UI

Prefer existing page objects (and their methods) over rebuilding EUI interactions in test files.
- Prefer **`readonly` locator fields** assigned in the constructor for stable selectors, and **methods** for parameterized locators, multi-step actions, or flows. Thin getter-only methods for every field add noise; match the patterns used by built-in page objects (for example `DashboardApp`).

<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  await pageObjects.datePicker.setAbsoluteRange({
    from: 'Sep 19, 2015 @ 06:31:44.000',
    to: 'Sep 23, 2015 @ 18:31:44.000',
  });
  ```
</dropdown>


## Keep mocks and non-UI setup out of page objects

Page objects should focus on real UI interaction. Put HTTP mocks, interceptors, and similar setup in dedicated fixtures (for example `fixtures/mocks.ts`) so tests and reviewers can find them in one place.

## Abstract common operations in page object methods

Create methods for repeated flows (and make them [wait for readiness](#wait-for-ui-updates-when-the-next-action-requires-it)).
<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  async openNewDashboard() {
    await this.page.testSubj.click('newItemButton');
    await this.page.testSubj.waitForSelector('emptyDashboardWidget', { state: 'visible' });
  }
  ```
</dropdown>


## Avoid conditional logic in page objects and tests

Playwright creates a fresh browser context for each test, so there is no cached state to work around. Both page object methods and test code should be explicit about the action they perform, not defensive about the current state. Conditional flows (like "if modal is open, close it first") hide bugs, waste time, and make failures harder to understand.
<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don’t:** add conditional logic to handle unknown state:
  ```ts
  async switchToEditMode() {
    const isViewMode = await this.page.testSubj.locator('dashboardViewMode').isVisible();
    if (isViewMode) {
      await this.page.testSubj.click('dashboardEditMode');
    }
  }
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** make the action explicit, since the caller knows the expected state:
  ```ts
  async openEditMode() {
    await this.page.testSubj.click('dashboardEditMode');
    await this.page.testSubj.waitForSelector('dashboardIsEditing', { state: 'visible' });
  }
  ```
</dropdown>


## Keep assertions explicit in tests, not hidden in page objects

Prefer explicit `expect()` in the test file so reviewers can see intent and failure modes. Also prefer `expect()` over manual boolean checks, as Playwright’s error output includes the locator, call log, and a clear message, which `if`/`throw` patterns lose.
**In page objects, avoid `expect()`.** Use `waitForSelector` / visibility waits to synchronize after navigation or actions (for example wait for a header to be visible). Assertions belong in specs.
<dropdown title="Examples">
  ❌ **Don’t:** hide assertions inside page objects:
  ```ts
  // inside page object
  async createIndexAndVerify(name: string) {
    await this.page.testSubj.click('saveButton');
    await expect(this.page.testSubj.locator('indicesTable')).toContainText(name);
  }
  ```
  ✔️ **Do:** keep assertions in the test file:
  ```ts
  await pageObjects.indexManagement.clickCreateIndexSaveButton();
  await expect(page.testSubj.locator('indicesTable')).toContainText(testIndexName);
  ```
</dropdown>


## Use EUI wrappers as class fields in page objects

If you must interact with EUI internals, use wrappers from Scout to keep that complexity out of tests.
<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  import { EuiComboBoxWrapper, ScoutPage } from '@kbn/scout';

  export class StreamsAppPage {
    public readonly fieldComboBox: EuiComboBoxWrapper;

    constructor(private readonly page: ScoutPage) {
      this.fieldComboBox = new EuiComboBoxWrapper(this.page, 'fieldSelectorComboBox');
    }

    async selectField(value: string) {
      await this.fieldComboBox.selectSingleOption(value);
    }
  }
  ```
</dropdown>


## Add accessibility checks at key UI checkpoints

Scout supports automated accessibility (a11y) scanning via `page.checkA11y`. Add checks at high-value points in your UI tests (landing pages, modals, flyouts, wizard steps) rather than on every interaction.
<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  const { violations } = await page.checkA11y({ include: ['[data-test-subj="myPanel"]'] });
  expect(violations).toHaveLength(0);
  ```
</dropdown>

For the full guide (scoping, exclusions, handling pre-existing violations), see [Accessibility testing](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/a11y-checks).

## Skip onboarding with `addInitScript`

If a page has onboarding/getting-started state, set `localStorage` before navigation.
<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  test.beforeEach(async ({ page, browserAuth, pageObjects }) => {
    await browserAuth.loginAsViewer();
    await page.addInitScript(() => {
      window.localStorage.setItem('gettingStartedVisited', 'true');
    });
    await pageObjects.homepage.goto();
  });
  ```
</dropdown>


## Extend `browserAuth` for repeated roles

If the same custom role appears in many specs, extract it into a `browserAuth` fixture extension instead of repeating the role descriptor everywhere. Tests then read like intent.
<dropdown title="Example">
  ```ts
  // in your plugin's fixtures/index.ts
  await use({
    ...browserAuth,
    loginAsPlatformEngineer: () =>
      browserAuth.loginWithCustomRole('platform_engineer', roleDescriptor),
  });

  // in specs
  await browserAuth.loginAsPlatformEngineer();
  ```
  For setup details, see [Reuse role helpers](/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/browser-auth#scout-browser-auth-extend).
</dropdown>


## Related guides

- [General best practices](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/best-practices) — apply to both UI and API tests
- [Write UI tests](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/write-ui-tests)
- [Browser authentication](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/browser-auth)
- [Page objects](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/page-objects)
- [Accessibility (a11y) checks](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/a11y-checks)
- [Parallelism](https://docs-v3-preview.elastic.dev/elastic/kibana/tree/main/extend/scout/parallelism)