Sort search results
Elastic Stack
Allows you to add one or more sorts on specific fields. Each sort can be reversed as well. The sort is defined on a per field level, with special field name for _score
to sort by score, and _doc
to sort by index order.
To optimize sorting performance, avoid sorting by text
fields; instead, use keyword
or numerical
fields. Additionally, you can improve performance by enabling pre-sorting at index time using index sorting. While this can speed up query-time sorting, it may reduce indexing performance and increase memory usage.
Assuming the following index mapping:
PUT /my-index-000001
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"post_date": { "type": "date" },
"user": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"name": {
"type": "keyword"
},
"age": { "type": "integer" }
}
}
}
GET /my-index-000001/_search
{
"sort" : [
{ "post_date" : {"order" : "asc", "format": "strict_date_optional_time_nanos"}},
"user",
{ "name" : "desc" },
{ "age" : "desc" },
"_score"
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "user" : "kimchy" }
}
}
_doc
has no real use-case besides being the most efficient sort order. So if you don’t care about the order in which documents are returned, then you should sort by _doc
. This especially helps when scrolling.
The search response includes sort
values for each document. Use the format
parameter to specify a date format for the sort
values of date
and date_nanos
fields. The following search returns sort
values for the post_date
field in the strict_date_optional_time_nanos
format.
GET /my-index-000001/_search
{
"sort" : [
{ "post_date" : {"format": "strict_date_optional_time_nanos"}}
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "user" : "kimchy" }
}
}
The order
option can have the following values:
asc
- Sort in ascending order
desc
- Sort in descending order
The order defaults to desc
when sorting on the _score
, and defaults to asc
when sorting on anything else.
Elasticsearch supports sorting by array or multi-valued fields. The mode
option controls what array value is picked for sorting the document it belongs to. The mode
option can have the following values:
min
- Pick the lowest value.
max
- Pick the highest value.
sum
- Use the sum of all values as sort value. Only applicable for number based array fields.
avg
- Use the average of all values as sort value. Only applicable for number based array fields.
median
- Use the median of all values as sort value. Only applicable for number based array fields.
The default sort mode in the ascending sort order is min
— the lowest value is picked. The default sort mode in the descending order is max
— the highest value is picked.
In the example below the field price has multiple prices per document. In this case the result hits will be sorted by price ascending based on the average price per document.
PUT /my-index-000001/_doc/1?refresh
{
"product": "chocolate",
"price": [20, 4]
}
POST /_search
{
"query" : {
"term" : { "product" : "chocolate" }
},
"sort" : [
{"price" : {"order" : "asc", "mode" : "avg"}}
]
}
For numeric fields it is also possible to cast the values from one type to another using the numeric_type
option. This option accepts the following values: ["double", "long", "date", "date_nanos"
] and can be useful for searches across multiple data streams or indices where the sort field is mapped differently.
Consider for instance these two indices:
PUT /index_double
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"field": { "type": "double" }
}
}
}
PUT /index_long
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"field": { "type": "long" }
}
}
}
Since field
is mapped as a double
in the first index and as a long
in the second index, it is not possible to use this field to sort requests that query both indices by default. However you can force the type to one or the other with the numeric_type
option in order to force a specific type for all indices:
POST /index_long,index_double/_search
{
"sort" : [
{
"field" : {
"numeric_type" : "double"
}
}
]
}
In the example above, values for the index_long
index are casted to a double in order to be compatible with the values produced by the index_double
index. It is also possible to transform a floating point field into a long
but note that in this case floating points are replaced by the largest value that is less than or equal (greater than or equal if the value is negative) to the argument and is equal to a mathematical integer.
This option can also be used to convert a date
field that uses millisecond resolution to a date_nanos
field with nanosecond resolution. Consider for instance these two indices:
PUT /index_double
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"field": { "type": "date" }
}
}
}
PUT /index_long
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"field": { "type": "date_nanos" }
}
}
}
Values in these indices are stored with different resolutions so sorting on these fields will always sort the date
before the date_nanos
(ascending order). With the numeric_type
type option it is possible to set a single resolution for the sort, setting to date
will convert the date_nanos
to the millisecond resolution while date_nanos
will convert the values in the date
field to the nanoseconds resolution:
POST /index_long,index_double/_search
{
"sort" : [
{
"field" : {
"numeric_type" : "date_nanos"
}
}
]
}
To avoid overflow, the conversion to date_nanos
cannot be applied on dates before 1970 and after 2262 as nanoseconds are represented as longs.
Elasticsearch also supports sorting by fields that are inside one or more nested objects. The sorting by nested field support has a nested
sort option with the following properties:
path
- Defines on which nested object to sort. The actual sort field must be a direct field inside this nested object. When sorting by nested field, this field is mandatory.
filter
- A filter that the inner objects inside the nested path should match with in order for its field values to be taken into account by sorting. Common case is to repeat the query / filter inside the nested filter or query. By default no
filter
is active. max_children
- The maximum number of children to consider per root document when picking the sort value. Defaults to unlimited.
nested
- Same as top-level
nested
but applies to another nested path within the current nested object.
Elasticsearch will throw an error if a nested field is defined in a sort without a nested
context.
In the below example offer
is a field of type nested
. The nested path
needs to be specified; otherwise, Elasticsearch doesn’t know on what nested level sort values need to be captured.
POST /_search
{
"query" : {
"term" : { "product" : "chocolate" }
},
"sort" : [
{
"offer.price" : {
"mode" : "avg",
"order" : "asc",
"nested": {
"path": "offer",
"filter": {
"term" : { "offer.color" : "blue" }
}
}
}
}
]
}
In the below example parent
and child
fields are of type nested
. The nested.path
needs to be specified at each level; otherwise, Elasticsearch doesn’t know on what nested level sort values need to be captured.
POST /_search
{
"query": {
"nested": {
"path": "parent",
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": {"range": {"parent.age": {"gte": 21}}},
"filter": {
"nested": {
"path": "parent.child",
"query": {"match": {"parent.child.name": "matt"}}
}
}
}
}
}
},
"sort" : [
{
"parent.child.age" : {
"mode" : "min",
"order" : "asc",
"nested": {
"path": "parent",
"filter": {
"range": {"parent.age": {"gte": 21}}
},
"nested": {
"path": "parent.child",
"filter": {
"match": {"parent.child.name": "matt"}
}
}
}
}
}
]
}
Nested sorting is also supported when sorting by scripts and sorting by geo distance.
The missing
parameter specifies how docs which are missing the sort field should be treated: The missing
value can be set to _last
, _first
, or a custom value (that will be used for missing docs as the sort value). The default is _last
.
For example:
GET /_search
{
"sort" : [
{ "price" : {"missing" : "_last"} }
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "product" : "chocolate" }
}
}
If a nested inner object doesn’t match with the nested.filter
then a missing value is used.
By default, the search request will fail if there is no mapping associated with a field. The unmapped_type
option allows you to ignore fields that have no mapping and not sort by them. The value of this parameter is used to determine what sort values to emit. Here is an example of how it can be used:
GET /_search
{
"sort" : [
{ "price" : {"unmapped_type" : "long"} }
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "product" : "chocolate" }
}
}
If any of the indices that are queried doesn’t have a mapping for price
then Elasticsearch will handle it as if there was a mapping of type long
, with all documents in this index having no value for this field.
Allow to sort by _geo_distance
. Here is an example, assuming pin.location
is a field of type geo_point
:
GET /_search
{
"sort" : [
{
"_geo_distance" : {
"pin.location" : [-70, 40],
"order" : "asc",
"unit" : "km",
"mode" : "min",
"distance_type" : "arc",
"ignore_unmapped": true
}
}
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "user" : "kimchy" }
}
}
distance_type
- How to compute the distance. Can either be
arc
(default), orplane
(faster, but inaccurate on long distances and close to the poles). mode
- What to do in case a field has several geo points. By default, the shortest distance is taken into account when sorting in ascending order and the longest distance when sorting in descending order. Supported values are
min
,max
,median
andavg
. unit
- The unit to use when computing sort values. The default is
m
(meters). ignore_unmapped
- Indicates if the unmapped field should be treated as a missing value. Setting it to
true
is equivalent to specifying anunmapped_type
in the field sort. The default isfalse
(unmapped field cause the search to fail).
geo distance sorting does not support configurable missing values: the distance will always be considered equal to Infinity
when a document does not have values for the field that is used for distance computation.
The following formats are supported in providing the coordinates:
GET /_search
{
"sort" : [
{
"_geo_distance" : {
"pin.location" : {
"lat" : 40,
"lon" : -70
},
"order" : "asc",
"unit" : "km"
}
}
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "user" : "kimchy" }
}
}
Format in Well-Known Text.
GET /_search
{
"sort": [
{
"_geo_distance": {
"pin.location": "POINT (-70 40)",
"order": "asc",
"unit": "km"
}
}
],
"query": {
"term": { "user": "kimchy" }
}
}
GET /_search
{
"sort": [
{
"_geo_distance": {
"pin.location": "drm3btev3e86",
"order": "asc",
"unit": "km"
}
}
],
"query": {
"term": { "user": "kimchy" }
}
}
Format in [lon, lat]
, note, the order of lon/lat here in order to conform with GeoJSON.
GET /_search
{
"sort": [
{
"_geo_distance": {
"pin.location": [ -70, 40 ],
"order": "asc",
"unit": "km"
}
}
],
"query": {
"term": { "user": "kimchy" }
}
}
Multiple geo points can be passed as an array containing any geo_point
format, for example
GET /_search
{
"sort": [
{
"_geo_distance": {
"pin.location": [ [ -70, 40 ], [ -71, 42 ] ],
"order": "asc",
"unit": "km"
}
}
],
"query": {
"term": { "user": "kimchy" }
}
}
and so forth.
The final distance for a document will then be min
/max
/avg
(defined via mode
) distance of all points contained in the document to all points given in the sort request.
Allow to sort based on custom scripts, here is an example:
GET /_search
{
"query": {
"term": { "user": "kimchy" }
},
"sort": {
"_script": {
"type": "number",
"script": {
"lang": "painless",
"source": "doc['field_name'].value * params.factor",
"params": {
"factor": 1.1
}
},
"order": "asc"
}
}
}
When sorting on a field, scores are not computed. By setting track_scores
to true, scores will still be computed and tracked.
GET /_search
{
"track_scores": true,
"sort" : [
{ "post_date" : {"order" : "desc"} },
{ "name" : "desc" },
{ "age" : "desc" }
],
"query" : {
"term" : { "user" : "kimchy" }
}
}
When sorting, the relevant sorted field values are loaded into memory. This means that per shard, there should be enough memory to contain them. For string based types, the field sorted on should not be analyzed / tokenized. For numeric types, if possible, it is recommended to explicitly set the type to narrower types (like short
, integer
and float
).